Contributors   |   Messages   |   Polls   |   Resources   |  
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 10 / 16   >   >>
Ariella
Ariella
11/29/2016 2:22:51 PM
User Rank
Author
Re: Caption Contest
@srufolo1 yes, I know that's the problem with the assumptions of the books we were given at the time. I found a good article on the concept here https://mises.org/library/myth-natural-monopoly

It is a myth that natural-monopoly theory was developed first by economists, and then used by legislators to "justify" franchise monopolies. The truth is that the monopolies were created decades before the theory was formalized by intervention-minded economists, who then used the theory as an ex post rationale for government intervention. At the time when the first government franchise monopolies were being granted, the large majority of economists understood that large-scale, capital-intensive production did not lead to monopoly, but was an absolutely desirable aspect of the competitive process.

 

Though the article first discusses public utilities, it does come to cable TV, as well:

"The theory of natural monopoly is an economic fiction. No such thing as a 'natural' monopoly has ever existed."

The existence of longstanding competition in the cable industry gives the lie to the notion that that industry is a "natural monopoly" and is therefore in need of franchise monopoly regulation. The cause of monopoly in cable TV is government regulation, not economies of scale. Although cable operators complain of "duplication," it is important to keep in mind that "while over-building an existing cable system can lower the profitability of the incumbent operator, it unambiguously improves the position of consumers who face prices determined not by historical costs, but by the interplay of supply and demand."[48]

Also like the case of electric power, researchers have found that in those cities where there are competing cable companies prices are about 23 percent below those of monopolistic cable operators.[49] Cablevision of Central Florida, for example, reduced its basic prices from $12.95 to $6.50 per month in "duopoly" areas in order to compete. When Telestat entered Riviera Beach, Florida, it offered 26 channels of basic service for $5.75, compared to Comcast's 12channel offering for $8.40 per month. Comcast responded by upgrading its service and dropping its prices.[50] In Presque Isle, Maine, when the city government invited competition, the incumbent firm quickly upgraded its service from only 12 to 54 channels.[51]

In 1987 the Pacific West Cable Company sued the city of Sacramento, California on First Amendment grounds for blocking its entry into the cable market. A jury found that "the Sacramento cable market was not a natural monopoly and that the claim of natural monopoly was a sham used by defendants as a pretext for granting a single cable television franchise ... to promote the making of cash payments and provision of 'in-kind' services ... and to obtain increased campaign contribution."[52] The city was forced to adopt a competitive cable policy, the result of which was that the incumbent cable operator, Scripps Howard, dropped its monthly price from $14.50 to $10 to meet a competitor's price. The company also offered free installation and three months free service in every area where it had competition.

50%
50%
srufolo1
srufolo1
11/29/2016 2:15:51 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Caption Contest
Whoever has their cellphones on, I would appreciate it if you could please turn them off!

50%
50%
srufolo1
srufolo1
11/29/2016 2:13:05 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Caption Contest
@Ariella You are probably correct, but it is part of history. The American Telephone & Telegraph Company was a monopoly, but I don't know how "natural" that was. Apparently the Department of Justice didn't think so. Because the antitrust suit in the 80s forced it to break up into 7 companies -- the "Baby Bells."

50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli
11/29/2016 1:40:18 PM
User Rank
Author
e
"The Commission votes 3-2 to allow the purchase of Water Works but oppose the acquisition of Park Place."

50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli
11/29/2016 1:34:28 PM
User Rank
Author
d
"In front of you, you'll see we've provided transcripts of earlier testimony and a tipping chart."

50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli
11/29/2016 1:32:41 PM
User Rank
Author
c
"I now pronounce you monopoly and acquihire.  You may split your stock."

50%
50%
elizabethv
elizabethv
11/29/2016 8:47:05 AM
User Rank
Platinum
Liz 5
"This is the last merger we'll try to do. No more mergers. We promise. "

 

"(whispers) Dale...." 

 

"Don't worry, I crossed my fingers." 

50%
50%
elizabethv
elizabethv
11/29/2016 8:44:53 AM
User Rank
Platinum
Liz 4
I understand your concerns about the share we'll have in the market, but just trust us it won't be an issue. I said it won't and it won't. Just trust us.

50%
50%
elizabethv
elizabethv
11/29/2016 8:42:59 AM
User Rank
Platinum
Liz 3
"You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means." 

50%
50%
faryl
faryl
11/29/2016 1:14:09 AM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: Faryl 1
@DHagar Thanks! :)

50%
50%
<<   <   Page 10 / 16   >   >>


Latest Articles
Italy's 5G auction could exceed a government target of raising €2.5 billion ($2.9 billion) after attracting interest from companies outside the mobile market.
The emerging-markets operator is focusing on the humdrum business of connectivity and keeping quiet about some of its ill-fated 'digitalization' efforts.
Three UK has picked Huawei over existing radio access network suppliers Nokia and Samsung to build its 5G network.
Vendor says that it's its biggest 5G deal to date.
Verizon skates where the puck is going by waiting for standards-based 5G devices to launch its mobile service in 2019.
On-the-Air Thursdays Digital Audio
Orange has been one of the leading proponents of SDN and NFV. In this Telco Transformation radio show, Orange's John Isch provides some perspective on his company's NFV/SDN journey.
Special Huawei Video
10/16/2017
Huawei Network Transformation Seminar
The adoption of virtualization technology and cloud architectures by telecom network operators is now well underway but there is still a long way to go before the transition to an era of Network Functions Cloudification (NFC) is complete.
Video
The Small Cell Forum's CEO Sue Monahan says that small cells will be crucial for indoor 5G coverage, but challenges around business models, siting ...
People, strategy, a strong technology roadmap and new business processes are the key underpinnings of Telstra's digital transformation, COO Robyn ...
Eric Bozich, vice president of products and marketing at CenturyLink, talks about the challenges and opportunities of integrating Level 3 into ...
Epsilon's Mark Daley, director of digital strategy and business development, talks about digital transformation from a wholesale service provider ...
Bill Walker, CenturyLink's director of network architecture, shares his insights on why training isn't enough for IT employees and traditional ...
All Videos
Telco Transformation
About Us     Contact Us     Help     Register     Twitter     Facebook     RSS
Copyright © 2024 Light Reading, part of Informa Tech,
a division of Informa PLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use
in partnership with