|
Contributors | Messages | Polls | Resources |
|
NFV Takes Center StageThe mobile industry has experienced quite the shake-up in the last few years, as consumers have seemingly favored over-the-top provider (OTT) services to traditional messaging services. Additionally, there has been increasing competition from cloud-based "freemium" messaging solutions as well. But the truth is that SMS, MMS and IP messaging remain a major source of revenue for mobile operators. In fact, the messaging market is predicted to generate $112.9 billion in 2019 alone, according to a Juniper Research report. However, in a bid to be more competitive and reduce total cost of ownership of hardware as it reaches end of life, CSPs are increasingly looking to evolve or replace infrastructure, urging them to make decisions on how best to support existing services, including New IP-based next-generation messaging. As a result, within the last three years, communications service providers (CSPs) have taken a number of steps to start the move toward virtualizing their networks. Through the implementation of Network Function Virtualization (NFV), mobile operators reap the benefits to compete with both OTT and cloud-based messaging solutions. After all, NFV's architecture enables low-cost elastic scale, service agility and a reduction in both capex and opex, ultimately transforming CSPs into cloud operators themselves. By doing so, NFV strengthens CSPs as competitive players within the mobile market, enabling them to go on the offense with message service delivery against OTT providers -- a capability they have lacked for years. In the first quarter of 2016, Xura Inc. and Heavy Reading carried out a detailed survey to assess the progress, market timing, business and technical drivers that CSPs are facing as they look to virtualize their network, with a particular focus on messaging services. The survey contained a total of 19 questions and was answered by over 70 qualified respondents in the CSP space. So what does the commitment to NFV entail? What are CSPs prioritizing in their race to virtualize their network? What are the biggest obstacles that CSPs need to consider?
The NFV commitment
The priorities For CSPs, there is some prioritization required when bringing new messaging systems online. Research found that the messaging services being prioritized for migration to an NFV-based virtualized platform in 2016 were SMS (27%), followed by spam and fraud messaging control (22%) and then IP messaging (21%). These findings show us that CSPs are looking to virtualize the services that are most heavily used -- like SMS -- on the network first and then align the launch of new offerings that may not yet be provided, like IP-based messaging services such as rich communication services (RCS), with deployments in NFV. Not surprisingly, services like MMS -- ones which have probably taken the biggest hit from OTT applications, seem to be furthest down the priority list, with nearly a third (31%) of respondents saying they had no plans to virtualize this service as of yet.
The obstacles to NFV Additionally, there is divergence in the industry as to a preferred orchestration framework. Over 40% of respondents indicated support for OpenStack -- using integrated in-house contractors such as Red Hat Inc. (NYSE: RHT), or telecom integrators like Hewlett Packard Enterprise -- yet so too did VMware Inc. (NYSE: VMW), meaning there’s no clear consensus on a preferred framework. It should be noted that, after some initial skepticism, OpenStack is gaining real credibility as a carrier grade framework in the marketplace. Given the continued demand for VMWare though and, to a lesser extent, Microsoft Azure (with 10% of mindshare from respondents), solutions need to be agnostic in their support for different orchestration and virtualization environments if they are to maximize the commercial opportunities available to providers. CSPs also considered cultural challenges and business case definition as the top business implementation challenges that their organization faced. Part of the challenge when it comes to an organization's culture and the implementation of NFV boils down to the inevitable power struggle over who has responsibility for the service implementation and delivery. Will it be the network team, the value added services team or the IT department? Who manages the budget, the platform and the team that will have responsibility for running it on a day-to-day basis?
So why pay attention now?
|
Latest Articles
Italy's 5G auction could exceed a government target of raising €2.5 billion ($2.9 billion) after attracting interest from companies outside the mobile market.
The emerging-markets operator is focusing on the humdrum business of connectivity and keeping quiet about some of its ill-fated 'digitalization' efforts.
Three UK has picked Huawei over existing radio access network suppliers Nokia and Samsung to build its 5G network.
Verizon skates where the puck is going by waiting for standards-based 5G devices to launch its mobile service in 2019.
On-the-Air Thursdays Digital Audio
ARCHIVED | December 7, 2017, 12pm EST
Orange has been one of the leading proponents of SDN and NFV. In this Telco Transformation radio show, Orange's John Isch provides some perspective on his company's NFV/SDN journey.
Special Huawei Video
Huawei Network Transformation Seminar The adoption of virtualization technology and cloud architectures by telecom network operators is now well underway but there is still a long way to go before the transition to an era of Network Functions Cloudification (NFC) is complete. |
|
|
||
Telco Transformation
About Us
Contact Us
Help
Register
Twitter
Facebook
RSS
Copyright © 2024 Light Reading, part of Informa Tech, a division of Informa PLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use in partnership with
|